Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your External Links shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the External Links offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of External Links at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a External Links? Wrong! If the External Links is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about External Links then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling External Links? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about External Links and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your External Links wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your External Links then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the External Links site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about External Links, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your External Links, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.

"WP:EL" redirects here; for information on edit locks, see Wikipedia:Edit lock. For the guideline on citation/reference links, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. For the style guide for interior links, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links).



Wikipedia articles can include links to Web pages outside Wikipedia. Such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks); or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to their reliability (such as reviews and interviews).

Some external links are welcome (see #What should be linked, below), but it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a comprehensive list of external links related to each topic. No page should be linked from a Wikipedia article unless its inclusion is justified.

The subject of this guideline is external links that are not citations of article sources. If the website or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source for the article, and citing it. Guidelines for sourcing, which includes external links used as citations, are discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources.

Important points to remember
  • Links should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links, or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • External links should not be used in the body of an article. Instead, include them in an "External links" section at the end or in the appropriate location within an infobox.
  • Try to avoid linking to multiple pages from the same website; instead, try to find an appropriate linking page within the site.


    • Restrictions on linking For WP:LOP or technical reasons, editors are restricted from linking to the following, without exception.

  • Sites that violate the copyrights of others per Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking_to_copyrighted_works should not be linked. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website has licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. If you know that an external Web site is carrying a work in violation of the creator's copyright, do not link to that copy of the work. Linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright.
  • Sites that match the M:Spam blacklist without being MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. Pages that contain such links cannot be saved.


    • What to link There are several things that should be considered when adding an external link.

    Each link should be considered on its merits, using the following guidelines. As the number of external links in an article grows longer, assessment should become stricter. When in doubt about the appropriateness of adding new links, make a suggestion on the article's talkpage and discuss with other editors.

    What should be linked
  • Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any.
  • An article about a book, a musical score, or some other media should link to a site hosting a copy of the work if none of the #Links normally to be avoided criteria apply.
  • Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.
  • Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews.


    • Links to be considered
  • For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews.
  • Very large pages should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Worldwide, many use Wikipedia with a low-speed connection. Unusually large pages should be annotated as such.
  • Long lists of links are not appropriate: WP:NOT#LINK. If you find a long list of links in an article, you can tag the "External links" section with the template. Where editors have not reached consensus on an appropriate list of links, a link to a well chosen web directory category could be used until such consensus can be reached. The Open Directory Project is often a neutral candidate, and may be added using the template.
  • Sites which fail to meet criteria for WP:RS yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources.


    • Links normally to be avoided Except for a link to a page that is the subject of the article or an official page of the article subject—and not prohibited by #Restrictions on linking—one should avoid:
  • Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Wikipedia:Featured articles.
  • Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/examples#Use of electronic or online sources for explanations of the terms "factually inaccurate material" or "unverifiable research".
  • Any site that attempts to surreptitiously install malware on a visitor's computer.
  • Links mainly intended to promote a website.
  • Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. For example, instead of linking to a commercial bookstore site, use Wikipedia:ISBN, giving readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book sources.
  • Links to sites with objectionable amounts of advertising.
  • Links to sites that #Sites requiring registration to view the relevant content.
  • Sites that are inaccessible to a substantial number of users, such as sites that only work with a specific browser.
  • Direct links to documents that require external applications (such as Flash or Java) to view the relevant content, unless the article is about such #Rich media. If you do link to such material make a note of what application is required.
  • Links to search engine results page and Search aggregator results pages.
  • Links to social network service (such as MySpace), discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups) or USENET.
  • Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority.
  • Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors.
  • Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject. Similarly, a website on a specific subject should usually not be linked from an article about a general subject. If a section of a general website is devoted to the subject of the article, and meets the other criteria for linking, then that part of the site could be deep-linked.


    • Advertising and conflicts of interest Due to the rising profile of Wikipedia and the amount of extra traffic it can bring a site, there is a great temptation to use Wikipedia to advertise or promote sites. This includes both commercial and non-commercial sites. You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked. If the link is to a relevant and informative site that should otherwise be included, please consider mentioning it on the talk page and let neutral and independent Wikipedia editors decide whether to add it. This is in line with the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines. Note that since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links may not alter search engine rankings.

    A few parties now appear to have a spambot capable of spamming wikis from several different wiki engines, analogous to the submitter scripts for guestbooks and blogs. If you see a bot inserting external links, please consider checking the other language wikis to see if the attack is widespread. If it is, please contact a sysop on the m:main page; they can put in a Wikimedia-wide text filter. Sysops will wikipedia:blocking policy unauthorized wikipedia:bots on sight.

    Sites requiring registration Sites that require registration or a paid subscription should be avoided because they are of limited use to most readers. Many online newspapers require registration to access some or all of their content, while some require a subscription. Online magazines frequently require subscriptions to access their sites or for premium content. If old newspaper and magazines articles are archived, there is usually a fee for accessing them.

    A site that requires registration or a subscription should not be linked unless the web site itself is the topic of the article.

    Non-English language content Links to English language content are strongly preferred in the English-language Wikipedia. It may be appropriate to have a link to a non-English-language site, such as when an official site is unavailable in English; or when the link is to the subject's text in its original language; or when the site contains visual aids such as maps, diagrams, or tables. Per the guideline on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Non-English-language sites.

    When linking to a site in a non-English language under the exceptions above, label the link with a :Category:Language icons, available for most languages, using two-letter language codes: for example, , , etc.

    Redirection sites URL redirection sites are not to be used. Examples of these sites include tinyurl.com and makeashorterlink.com. Most of these sites are listed in the m:Spam blacklist because they are frequently abused by link spammers, which means that it is not possible to save a page that contains such a link. Because URL redirection sites are added to the blacklist whenever abuse occurs, you may create problems for future editors by using them. Adding links to Anonymous web proxy is prohibited for a similar reason. Instead, one should add a link to the original URL.

    It is generally preferred to link to the exact destination of a link. For instance, if example.com is an automatic redirect to tripod.com/example, it is better to link to the exact page, even if the webmaster considers the redirect address to be more official.

    Rich media It is acceptable to link to pages rendered in normal HTML or plain text. Check that the content type of the linked page is "text/html", "text/plain", or "application/xhtml+xml" (or another XHTML content type) as some pages may instead be rendered solely by platform-dependent plugins. Try to avoid directly linking to any content that requires special software, or an add-on to a browser. It is always preferred to link to a page rendered in normal HTML that contains embedded links to the rich media.

    In an instance where a link to rich media is deemed appropriate, an explicit indication of the technology needed to access the content must be given, as in the following examples:



    Linking to YouTube, Google Video, and similar sites There is no blanket ban on linking to these sites as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page (which would be infrequent). See also Wikipedia:Copyrights for the prohibition on linking to pages that violate intellectual property rights.

    Avoid undue weight on particular points of view On articles with multiple points of view, the number of links dedicated to one point of view should not overwhelm the number dedicated to other equal points of view, nor give undue weight to minority views. Add comments to these links informing the reader of their point of view. If one point of view dominates informed opinion, that should be represented first. For more information, see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view—in particular, Wikipedia's guidelines on WP:NPOV#Undue weight.

    Longevity of links It is very important to consider if the link is likely to remain relevant and acceptable to the article in the foreseeable future. For example, it is not useful to link to a homepage that changes often and merely happens to have a relevant picture or article on its front page at the moment.

    What can be done with a dead external link Links to dead URLs in a list of external links are of no use to Wikipedia articles. Such dead links should either be removed, or updated with archived versions, which might be found at the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Note however, that the matter can be quite different when these links are references: see Wikipedia:Citing sources#What to do when a reference link "goes dead".

    Note that some dead links are caused by vandalism (for example, a vandal disabling links to products competing with the vandal's favored product): it is worth checking to see if there is a working version of the link in an earlier version of article. Some vandalism of this type is quite subtle, such as replacing ASCII letters in the URL with Homoglyph Cyrillic letters.

    Hijacked and re-registered sites Occasionally a site will either be "Domain hijacking", or be re-registered for a different purpose after a registration expires. In either case, while the URL is still valid it points to a page with different or altered content, which can lead to inappropriate content being linked, including in some cases pornography sites. Sites that have been hijacked or changed after reregistration should not be linked; they should be handled in the same manner as dead links.

    How to link Link with no text (code and example output):http://example.com/ http://example.com/ Link containing text: http://example.com/ The RFC-mandated example.com website http://example.com/ The RFC-mandated example.com website All text following a space is taken as the text to use for the link. Embedding wikilinks into the link text is incorrect; instead choose the appropriate words to link. "The RFC-mandated [http://example.com/ example.com website". "The RFC-mandated [http://example.com/ example.com website". === External links section === There are two basic formats for external links. The most common is to add a list of external links at the end of an article. Put here, in list form, any web sites that you have used or recommend for readers of the article. The standard format for these is to have a level 2 header (i.e. == Header ==) named "External links" followed by a bullet list of links. The header should be "External links" (plural) even if there is only a single link listed. If you link to another website, you should give your reader a good summary of the site's contents, and the reasons why this specific website is relevant to the article in question. If you cite an online article, try to provide as much meaningful citation information as possible. == External links == * http://example.com/link_1 Link 1 * http://example.com/link_2 Link 2

    References and citation Sites that have been used as sources in the creation of an article should be cited in the article, and linked as references, either in-line or in a references section. Links to these source sites are not "external links" for the purposes of this guideline, and should not be placed in an external links section. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources for specific formatting and linking guidelines for citations.

    Searching for external links Special:Linksearch is a tool for searching for links from Wikipedia articles to sites outside Wikipedia. For example, all Wikipedia pages linking to Yahoo.com

    See also For more detailed information regarding Wikipedia policy toward and appropriate syntax for external links, see:

    Maintenance coordination

    References ar:ويكيبيديا:وصلات خارجيةbg:Уикипедия:Външни препраткиca:Viquipèdia:Enllaços externscs:Wikipedie:Externí odkazyde:Wikipedia:Weblinkses:Wikipedia:Enlaces externosfa:ویکی‌پدیا:پیوندهای بیرونیfr:Aide:Liens externesid:Wikipedia:Pranala luarit:Wikipedia:Collegamenti esternimk:Википедија:Надворешни врскиms:Wikipedia:Pautan luarru:Википедия:Внешние ссылкиsk:Wikipédia:Externé odkazyfi:Wikipedia:Ulkoiset linkitsv:Wikipedia:Externa länkarth:วิกิพีเดีย:แหล่งข้อมูลอื่นvi:Wikipedia:Liên kết ngoàiuk:Вікіпедія:Зовнішні посиланняyi:װיקיפּעדיע:דערויסענדיגע לינקסzh:Wikipedia:外部链接 "WP:EL" redirects here; for information on edit locks, see Wikipedia:Edit lock. For the guideline on citation/reference links, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. For the style guide for interior links, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links).



    Wikipedia articles can include links to Web pages outside Wikipedia. Such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks); or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to their reliability (such as reviews and interviews).

    Some external links are welcome (see #What should be linked, below), but it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a comprehensive list of external links related to each topic. No page should be linked from a Wikipedia article unless its inclusion is justified.

    The subject of this guideline is external links that are not citations of article sources. If the website or page to which you want to link includes information that is not yet a part of the article, consider using it as a source for the article, and citing it. Guidelines for sourcing, which includes external links used as citations, are discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:Citing sources.

    Important points to remember
  • Links should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links, or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • External links should not be used in the body of an article. Instead, include them in an "External links" section at the end or in the appropriate location within an infobox.
  • Try to avoid linking to multiple pages from the same website; instead, try to find an appropriate linking page within the site.


    • Restrictions on linking For WP:LOP or technical reasons, editors are restricted from linking to the following, without exception.

  • Sites that violate the copyrights of others per Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking_to_copyrighted_works should not be linked. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website has licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. If you know that an external Web site is carrying a work in violation of the creator's copyright, do not link to that copy of the work. Linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on Wikipedia and its editors. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright.
  • Sites that match the M:Spam blacklist without being MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. Pages that contain such links cannot be saved.


    • What to link There are several things that should be considered when adding an external link.

    Each link should be considered on its merits, using the following guidelines. As the number of external links in an article grows longer, assessment should become stricter. When in doubt about the appropriateness of adding new links, make a suggestion on the article's talkpage and discuss with other editors.

    What should be linked
  • Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if any.
  • An article about a book, a musical score, or some other media should link to a site hosting a copy of the work if none of the #Links normally to be avoided criteria apply.
  • Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.
  • Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews.


    • Links to be considered
  • For albums, movies, books, and other creative works, links to professional reviews.
  • Very large pages should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Worldwide, many use Wikipedia with a low-speed connection. Unusually large pages should be annotated as such.
  • Long lists of links are not appropriate: WP:NOT#LINK. If you find a long list of links in an article, you can tag the "External links" section with the template. Where editors have not reached consensus on an appropriate list of links, a link to a well chosen web directory category could be used until such consensus can be reached. The Open Directory Project is often a neutral candidate, and may be added using the template.
  • Sites which fail to meet criteria for WP:RS yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources.


    • Links normally to be avoided Except for a link to a page that is the subject of the article or an official page of the article subject—and not prohibited by #Restrictions on linking—one should avoid:
  • Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Wikipedia:Featured articles.
  • Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/examples#Use of electronic or online sources for explanations of the terms "factually inaccurate material" or "unverifiable research".
  • Any site that attempts to surreptitiously install malware on a visitor's computer.
  • Links mainly intended to promote a website.
  • Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. For example, instead of linking to a commercial bookstore site, use Wikipedia:ISBN, giving readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book sources.
  • Links to sites with objectionable amounts of advertising.
  • Links to sites that #Sites requiring registration to view the relevant content.
  • Sites that are inaccessible to a substantial number of users, such as sites that only work with a specific browser.
  • Direct links to documents that require external applications (such as Flash or Java) to view the relevant content, unless the article is about such #Rich media. If you do link to such material make a note of what application is required.
  • Links to search engine results page and Search aggregator results pages.
  • Links to social network service (such as MySpace), discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups) or USENET.
  • Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority.
  • Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors.
  • Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject. Similarly, a website on a specific subject should usually not be linked from an article about a general subject. If a section of a general website is devoted to the subject of the article, and meets the other criteria for linking, then that part of the site could be deep-linked.


    • Advertising and conflicts of interest Due to the rising profile of Wikipedia and the amount of extra traffic it can bring a site, there is a great temptation to use Wikipedia to advertise or promote sites. This includes both commercial and non-commercial sites. You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked. If the link is to a relevant and informative site that should otherwise be included, please consider mentioning it on the talk page and let neutral and independent Wikipedia editors decide whether to add it. This is in line with the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines. Note that since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links may not alter search engine rankings.

    A few parties now appear to have a spambot capable of spamming wikis from several different wiki engines, analogous to the submitter scripts for guestbooks and blogs. If you see a bot inserting external links, please consider checking the other language wikis to see if the attack is widespread. If it is, please contact a sysop on the m:main page; they can put in a Wikimedia-wide text filter. Sysops will wikipedia:blocking policy unauthorized wikipedia:bots on sight.

    Sites requiring registration Sites that require registration or a paid subscription should be avoided because they are of limited use to most readers. Many online newspapers require registration to access some or all of their content, while some require a subscription. Online magazines frequently require subscriptions to access their sites or for premium content. If old newspaper and magazines articles are archived, there is usually a fee for accessing them.

    A site that requires registration or a subscription should not be linked unless the web site itself is the topic of the article.

    Non-English language content Links to English language content are strongly preferred in the English-language Wikipedia. It may be appropriate to have a link to a non-English-language site, such as when an official site is unavailable in English; or when the link is to the subject's text in its original language; or when the site contains visual aids such as maps, diagrams, or tables. Per the guideline on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Non-English-language sites.

    When linking to a site in a non-English language under the exceptions above, label the link with a :Category:Language icons, available for most languages, using two-letter language codes: for example, , , etc.

    Redirection sites URL redirection sites are not to be used. Examples of these sites include tinyurl.com and makeashorterlink.com. Most of these sites are listed in the m:Spam blacklist because they are frequently abused by link spammers, which means that it is not possible to save a page that contains such a link. Because URL redirection sites are added to the blacklist whenever abuse occurs, you may create problems for future editors by using them. Adding links to Anonymous web proxy is prohibited for a similar reason. Instead, one should add a link to the original URL.

    It is generally preferred to link to the exact destination of a link. For instance, if example.com is an automatic redirect to tripod.com/example, it is better to link to the exact page, even if the webmaster considers the redirect address to be more official.

    Rich media It is acceptable to link to pages rendered in normal HTML or plain text. Check that the content type of the linked page is "text/html", "text/plain", or "application/xhtml+xml" (or another XHTML content type) as some pages may instead be rendered solely by platform-dependent plugins. Try to avoid directly linking to any content that requires special software, or an add-on to a browser. It is always preferred to link to a page rendered in normal HTML that contains embedded links to the rich media.

    In an instance where a link to rich media is deemed appropriate, an explicit indication of the technology needed to access the content must be given, as in the following examples:



    Linking to YouTube, Google Video, and similar sites There is no blanket ban on linking to these sites as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page (which would be infrequent). See also Wikipedia:Copyrights for the prohibition on linking to pages that violate intellectual property rights.

    Avoid undue weight on particular points of view On articles with multiple points of view, the number of links dedicated to one point of view should not overwhelm the number dedicated to other equal points of view, nor give undue weight to minority views. Add comments to these links informing the reader of their point of view. If one point of view dominates informed opinion, that should be represented first. For more information, see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view—in particular, Wikipedia's guidelines on WP:NPOV#Undue weight.

    Longevity of links It is very important to consider if the link is likely to remain relevant and acceptable to the article in the foreseeable future. For example, it is not useful to link to a homepage that changes often and merely happens to have a relevant picture or article on its front page at the moment.

    What can be done with a dead external link Links to dead URLs in a list of external links are of no use to Wikipedia articles. Such dead links should either be removed, or updated with archived versions, which might be found at the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Note however, that the matter can be quite different when these links are references: see Wikipedia:Citing sources#What to do when a reference link "goes dead".

    Note that some dead links are caused by vandalism (for example, a vandal disabling links to products competing with the vandal's favored product): it is worth checking to see if there is a working version of the link in an earlier version of article. Some vandalism of this type is quite subtle, such as replacing ASCII letters in the URL with Homoglyph Cyrillic letters.

    Hijacked and re-registered sites Occasionally a site will either be "Domain hijacking", or be re-registered for a different purpose after a registration expires. In either case, while the URL is still valid it points to a page with different or altered content, which can lead to inappropriate content being linked, including in some cases pornography sites. Sites that have been hijacked or changed after reregistration should not be linked; they should be handled in the same manner as dead links.

    How to link Link with no text (code and example output):http://example.com/ http://example.com/ Link containing text: http://example.com/ The RFC-mandated example.com website http://example.com/ The RFC-mandated example.com website All text following a space is taken as the text to use for the link. Embedding wikilinks into the link text is incorrect; instead choose the appropriate words to link. "The RFC-mandated [http://example.com/ example.com website". "The RFC-mandated [http://example.com/ example.com website". === External links section === There are two basic formats for external links. The most common is to add a list of external links at the end of an article. Put here, in list form, any web sites that you have used or recommend for readers of the article. The standard format for these is to have a level 2 header (i.e. == Header ==) named "External links" followed by a bullet list of links. The header should be "External links" (plural) even if there is only a single link listed. If you link to another website, you should give your reader a good summary of the site's contents, and the reasons why this specific website is relevant to the article in question. If you cite an online article, try to provide as much meaningful citation information as possible. == External links == * http://example.com/link_1 Link 1 * http://example.com/link_2 Link 2

    References and citation Sites that have been used as sources in the creation of an article should be cited in the article, and linked as references, either in-line or in a references section. Links to these source sites are not "external links" for the purposes of this guideline, and should not be placed in an external links section. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources for specific formatting and linking guidelines for citations.

    Searching for external links Special:Linksearch is a tool for searching for links from Wikipedia articles to sites outside Wikipedia. For example, all Wikipedia pages linking to Yahoo.com

    See also For more detailed information regarding Wikipedia policy toward and appropriate syntax for external links, see:

    Maintenance coordination

    References ar:ويكيبيديا:وصلات خارجيةbg:Уикипедия:Външни препраткиca:Viquipèdia:Enllaços externscs:Wikipedie:Externí odkazyde:Wikipedia:Weblinkses:Wikipedia:Enlaces externosfa:ویکی‌پدیا:پیوندهای بیرونیfr:Aide:Liens externesid:Wikipedia:Pranala luarit:Wikipedia:Collegamenti esternimk:Википедија:Надворешни врскиms:Wikipedia:Pautan luarru:Википедия:Внешние ссылкиsk:Wikipédia:Externé odkazyfi:Wikipedia:Ulkoiset linkitsv:Wikipedia:Externa länkarth:วิกิพีเดีย:แหล่งข้อมูลอื่นvi:Wikipedia:Liên kết ngoàiuk:Вікіпедія:Зовнішні посиланняyi:װיקיפּעדיע:דערויסענדיגע לינקסzh:Wikipedia:外部链接

     

    External Links



     
    Copyright © 2008 Hintcenter.com - All rights reserved.
    Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
    All Trademarks belong to their repective owners. Many aspects of this page are used under
    commercial commons license from Yahoo!